- What We Do
- Future North West (formerly Regional Strategy (RS2010))
- Regional Planning
- North West of England Plan - Regional Spatial Strategy to 2021
- Preparing 'The North West of England Plan'
- Key Spatial Principles
- Regional Spatial Framework
- Working in the North West - Achieving a Sustainable Economy
- Living in the North West - Ensuring a Strong, Healthy and Just Society
- Transport in the North West - Connecting people and places
- Planning for the Environment, Minerals, Waste and Energy
- Implementation of the Regional Spatial Strategy
- Sustainability Appraisal of the North West of England Plan - Regional Spatial Strategy to 2021
- Monitoring and Review of the Regional Spatial Strategy
- Coastal
- Partial Review of Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) 2008-2010 [NOT PROGRESSED TO COMPLETION]
- North West of England Plan - Regional Spatial Strategy to 2021
- Regional Housing
- Regional Transport
- Economic Development
- How We Do It
- Equality & Diversity
- Sustainability
- Europe
- Scrutiny
4NW Signup:
Fill in your details below to be kept informed about 4NW's work.
RSS Implementation Framework - Key Principles
Please note Regional Strategies / Regional Spatial Strategies were revoked with immediate effect on 6th July 2010. |
A number of guiding principles were used to develop the Implementation Framework (IF). These included:
Linkages - close links were made with RSS review and annual monitoring processes. The framework linked the plan's vision and objectives to implementation actions and the agencies; and the targets and indicators which will measure performance. An important aspect of the overall RSS process was monitoring performance and the RSS Annual Monitoring Report reported on performance using the targets and indicators listed in the IF.
Flexibility - the flexibility to deal
quickly with changing national, regional and (where appropriate)
local circumstances as part of a plan, monitor, manage approach.
Strategic nature - provide a strong, clear strategic steer and avoid excessive detail.
Engage with partners - actively work with partners to ensure understanding of and buy-in to RSS delivery. 4NW itself undertook a limited number of implementation actions and projects. Beyond this the only organisations that had a direct duty to implement RSS were the local planning authorities. Many other organisations undertake actions that did link to implementation of the RSS, however the RSS itself was not the key driver behind their actions. The IF approach therefore:
- Provided information on implementation activities of 4NW and
partners, and also on how 4NW could help Local Planning
Authorities in their implementation through LDFs and planning
application decisions.
- Focused on key strategic implementation actions. 4NW regularly met with many key regional and sub-regional organisations to progress implementation of the RSS.
Identifying the funding and infrastructure
implications of the RSS - Key
areas of infrastructure include transport, waste, water supply and
disposal, energy and flood alleviation. Alongside these
is the overarching issue of climate change.
Effective monitoring - targets and indicators need to be measurable and realistic, and they need to be specific to the particular objectives and policies they are measuring. Use was made of a mix of different types of indicator, including:
- "Output" indicators which measured the specific
contribution of the RSS through the development plan system, e.g.
percentage of new housing on brownfield sites. These most directly
measured the achievements of the Plan, however, there were a
limited number outcomes where the Plan's contribution can
be directly measured.
- "Context" indicators, which measured overall
outcomes, but do less to indicate the specific contribution of the
planning system, e.g. increasing GVA.
- Significant Effects. These are special context indicators
derived from the Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic
Environmental Appraisal (SA /SEA) process against which long term
delivery of the RSS was measured.
Limited use was made of operational or "process"
targets, for example, to write strategy x by date y. These
did not measure outcomes and therefore did not directly assess
effectiveness of the RSS in achieving its policy objectives.
